Sunday, May 12, 2019

Ethics andPublic Administration Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Ethics andPublic disposition - Essay ExampleThe author of the paper Ethics and Public Administration assumes that righteousness defines the way in which one differentiates their intentions, how they arrive at their decisions and choose actions that their consciousness perceives to be right wing over what is wrong (Kakabadse, Korac-Kakabadse & Kouizmin 2003). Politics, on the other hand, entails the practice of structured control over people on an individual or civic level by those in governance positions. The functions of government range from making laws to negotiating with opposing semipolitical find outs in order to promote ones views, to exercising force against enemies (which whitethorn include warf ar). On the social level, politics is practiced from family units, clans, tribes and societies. On a broader scale, it is inherently present in local governments, institutions, states and international levels (Kakabadse, Korac-Kakabadse & Kouizmin 2003). In view of morality and politics, Machiavelli, an Italian writer, humanist, philosopher, diplomat and politician of the renaissance period, argued that the requirements of the twain are not compatible. Although there are upright, incorruptible politicians, it is common knowledge that most require answer from influential individuals or corporate bodies to get past the preliminary stages of elections. However, this help is more often than not to be paid back, which forms the basis of argument of this paper, which will support the argument that the requirements of a moral and political life are incompatible.... When factional conduct is pursued, it always compromises the goal of common welfare which politicians are ideally meant to achieve. Evidently, factions are, therefore, the results of twain public and private corruption among the citizens. Machiavelli believed that to avoid the corruption, one had to choose surrounded by two sets of virtues. Whoever chose personal morality would have to give up any vision of an unwavering and prosperous society where everyone flourishes on what is truly earned. On the other hand, whoever chose politics would have to give up all hopes of quenching personal anxiety. 1 sees that Machiavellis thinking shows that although the ultimate goal of personal morality and politics may be the same, they are driven by entirely different sets of values that contradict each other and may leave out rational, achievable solutions (James 2003). After officiating in the Florentine Republic as secretary to the chancery and organism responsible for military and diplomatic affairs, Machiavellis arguments must have been informed by actual experiences. whiz of his popular writings, The Prince, was done after the recovery of power by the Medici, who were not in power during the date he served as secretary to the chancery. From The Prince, one can draw a picture of Machiavellis view of political rule without influence of ethics or morals, where the politicians are c ompletely conscious of the institution of politics in exercising power effectively. Like many political philosophers, Machiavelli believes there is a correlation between authority and moral uprightness. However, he goes further to point out that the relationship is different when it comes to legitimate authority. workout political power can

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.